Page 2 of 30 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 293

Thread: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

  1. #11
    Member cookies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    364
    Length
    SL/BSL/TBL
    Type
    2b/2c/M/C/ii/iii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    Thank you for taking the time for this Vara La Fey!

    It’s tough to determine which markers are 3in apart when that varies so widely from person to person.
    On my body for example, I’d split the Waist to Classic into WL to BCL and BCL to Classic. Also FTL=MTL on me.
    I do like the list Bat suggested. And I do think Buzz to Ear and Ear to Chin is an important split, because starting from scratch can be the toughest, so getting to graduate a thread soon-ish can be very encouraging I imagine.
    overall: SL>>>APL>>>BSL>>>WL>>>HL>>>BCL>>>TBL
    natural: 0>>>EL>>>CL>>>SL

  2. #12
    Member Vara La Fey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Location
    Sin City USA
    Posts
    304
    Length
    22/33/40
    Type
    1c/2a/C/ii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bat View Post
    I'm fine with keeping it buzz to Chin i just wouldn't be opposed if they did it ear, bcl and collarbone don't really need a topic fingertip is arguble since mosy people like the idea but some like me prefer mtl to be mentioned it was my goal when i first joined
    On me CBL is way more than 3" from SL and from APL, so should still be over 3" on most people. Thus I say CBL totally needs its own marker and thread.

    Also on me FTL and MT are the same. I think FTL is important due to common skirt length in corporate dress codes, but MT is the same on everyone regardless of proportions, which is also important and maybe more meaningful. Hmmm....

  3. #13
    Member Vara La Fey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Location
    Sin City USA
    Posts
    304
    Length
    22/33/40
    Type
    1c/2a/C/ii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    Quote Originally Posted by cookies View Post
    Thank you for taking the time for this Vara La Fey!
    It’s tough to determine which markers are 3in apart when that varies so widely from person to person.
    On my body for example, I’d split the Waist to Classic into WL to BCL and BCL to Classic. Also FTL=MTL on me.
    I do like the list Bat suggested. And I do think Buzz to Ear and Ear to Chin is an important split, because starting from scratch can be the toughest, so getting to graduate a thread soon-ish can be very encouraging I imagine.
    YW.

    3" is important because that's 6 months of growth on average. So I'm not considering just the length, but that stretch of time in which anything can happen. Plus I think 6 months seems like a nice graduation interval.

    Agreed that early graduation is prolly good incentive to keep going. Where on the ear constitutes Ear Length?

  4. #14
    Bats Fly At Night Bat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    The Underworld
    Age
    38
    Posts
    9,656
    Length
    Bald/Ugly/Calf
    Type
    1c/2a/C/ii/iii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bat View Post
    Changing my list a bit probably getting a bit overboard lol I know I said originally that it was too nit picky but here I am now trying to be inclusive of all milestones

    All Lengths Thread
    Buzz to Cheekbone or Buzz to Pixie
    Cheekbone to Chin or Pixie to Chin
    Chin to Shoulder
    Shoulder to Collarbone
    Collarbone to Armpit
    Armpit to Midback
    Midback to Waist
    Waist to Hip
    Hip to Butt (sounds better than Buttcrack)
    Butt to Tailbone
    Tailbone to MTL
    Fingertip ( fingertip seems to be pretty popular so maybe have its own thread??)
    Mid thigh to Knee
    Knee to Upper Calf
    Upper Calf to Lower calf
    Lower Calf to Ankle
    Ankle to Floor and Beyond
    Terminal
    Quoting myself as I edited my post

  5. #15
    LHC FairyGodMum lapushka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    68,242
    Length
    Chin/Class/Class
    Type
    2b/2c/F/iii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    I think I would leave well enough alone. Oh gosh, why the upheaval? These threads are "ingrained" into the LHC by now. Changing things up will bring *so much confusion* about that it's not going to be "nice" and will actually (IMO) scare people off from posting. You can't police something that has grown into what it has grown into. It's just MHO, I don't know how anyone else feels, as I just browsed the first post. It seems a whole lot of effort to just get some "structure" into something that can't be structured, but that's me.

    I mean, I applaud your efforts, but I fear they are in vain.
    WCC method (washing) --- Rinse-out oil (MO) --- LOC/LCO method (styling)

  6. #16
    Bats Fly At Night Bat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    The Underworld
    Age
    38
    Posts
    9,656
    Length
    Bald/Ugly/Calf
    Type
    1c/2a/C/ii/iii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    There is nothing wrong with change updating at the very least just fix up so we don't have 2-3 tailbone waist hip threads

  7. #17
    Member Aerya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    an enchanted forest
    Posts
    1,219
    Length
    CBL/WL/idk
    Type
    1b/F/M/ii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    I think it could be nice to at least merge the threads that have the same lengths, like waist to hip and waist to tailbone.
    I am my mother's savage daughter; the one who runs barefoot, cursing sharp stones
    I am my mother's savage daughter; I will not cut my hair, I will not lower my voice.

  8. #18
    Bats Fly At Night Bat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    The Underworld
    Age
    38
    Posts
    9,656
    Length
    Bald/Ugly/Calf
    Type
    1c/2a/C/ii/iii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    https://forums.longhaircommunity.com...d.php?t=156026 I made a vote thread that's just for voting in the poll can add to the first post possibly

  9. #19
    Long tea-time for hair neko_kawaii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Thats the temperature - not the speed limit.
    Posts
    12,674
    Length
    12 in/58.5/term
    Type
    2a/F/ii

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    It is a bit of a mess, isn’t it!

    I don’t have time to do the figuring out, but keep discussing and make detailed specific suggestions and I can merge, rename, and update the index as needed once folks are happy with their ideas.

    One suggestion, if new separate threads are more useful than merging, we can lock the older thread(s) and put links to the new both as a new post and as an ETA in the old so when folks who had previously participated in those threads turn up they can find the redirects to the active threads.

    58.5 in, 2a, F, ii (3 in)
    Lady Kawaii-In-The-Garden the Terminally Curious of the Order of the Long Haired Knights
    Mod hat off. Mod hat on. Don't make me wear the mod hat, it messes up my hair. *grin*

  10. #20

    Default Re: Should we restructure the Length-Specific Threads?

    I would have rather there been a Waist -Hip and a Hip-Tailbone thread myself, but I have posted photos with my WL hair in the latter along with many others and it would be out of the place if the name is changed. Since the waist-hip thread is very quiet I don’t post there even though I would rather be able to graduate another length thread eventually. merging the two would probably be easier than attempting the split the waist-tailbone thread, I assume!
    WL & growing on to HL last bleach nov 2020 final goal is HL virgin hair by 6/2025 for my 40th

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •