PDA

View Full Version : Thought you all might like this....regarding coconut oil>>>>>


Shae
January 9th, 2011, 10:07 AM
http://journal.scconline.org/pdf/cc2003/cc054n02/p00175-p00192.pdf
ktani
January 9th, 2011, 10:13 AM
http://journal.scconline.org/pdf/cc2003/cc054n02/p00175-p00192.pdf

Have you seen this, that quotes from the above pdf supporting what can be done with some of the infornation in it? http://forums.longhaircommunity.com/showthread.php?t=57025
Shae
January 9th, 2011, 10:36 AM
No, I didn't see that. Thanks!! :)
ktani
January 9th, 2011, 10:42 AM
No, I didn't see that. Thanks!! :)

You are most welcome!

Start with the Article in the first post. You do not need to read the entire thread.
x0h_bother
January 9th, 2011, 11:08 AM
I really like this article. Will be reading more when I get home! :)
smcm1232
January 11th, 2011, 03:36 AM
Like coconut oil gonna read!
x0h_bother
January 11th, 2011, 12:09 PM
I love how the study indicated coconut oil as being better pre-wash. Just using one ethnicity (indian) hair is one flaw here. Love the article!
redcelticcurls
January 11th, 2011, 12:10 PM
I still hate it in my hair, lol.
Shae
January 11th, 2011, 12:23 PM
I still hate it in my hair, lol.

Yeah, I know what you mean! I can ONLY use a little on my ends pre-shampoo.
Athena's Owl
January 11th, 2011, 12:28 PM
I love how the study indicated coconut oil as being better pre-wash. Just using one ethnicity (indian) hair is one flaw here. Love the article!

I don't think it's much of a flaw. Hair is hair. the differences are trivial. They might have used Remy hair because it's the most easily obtained unprocessed long hair available.

I also note that the tests done on clients with hair on their heads did not mention that they were selected because they were south asian with unproccessed hair. That's where I see a flaw in the reporting.
x0h_bother
January 11th, 2011, 12:34 PM
snipet:I also note that the tests done on clients with hair on their heads did not mention that they were selected because they were south asian with unproccessed hair. That's where I see a flaw in the reporting.
Yes, I saw this too, but then I assumed they covered that when they said all the hair used was Indian. :shrug:
I think different texture and thickness of the strands would make a difference. (Not talking about the labels curly or straight.) Leaves room for more research! :)
ktani
January 11th, 2011, 02:05 PM
Yes, I saw this too, but then I assumed they covered that when they said all the hair used was Indian. :shrug:
I think different texture and thickness of the strands would make a difference. (Not talking about the labels curly or straight.) Leaves room for more research! :)

See pages 3 and 4 of the pdf. They do specify.


"Samples of straight, curly, wavy and permed hair of Indian origin were used in this work. ...


Bleached hair was prepared by using a bleaching kit containing 30 vol. hydrogen ..."
http://journal.scconline.org/pdf/cc2003/cc054n02/p00175-p00192.pdf
x0h_bother
January 12th, 2011, 09:58 AM
See pages 3 and 4 of the pdf. They do specify.


"Samples of straight, curly, wavy and permed hair of Indian origin were used in this work. ...


Bleached hair was prepared by using a bleaching kit containing 30 vol. hydrogen ..."
http://journal.scconline.org/pdf/cc2003/cc054n02/p00175-p00192.pdf

Yes but we were talking about the subjects' half-heads of hair they experimented on right? I saw that they did not specify whether those subejects were of Indian origin, so I just assumed the subjects were included in the above quote that mentions the samples of hair.