I consider past ear length to be longer-then-normal on a man. That is, it's not LONG, but it's worth noticing, and perhaps a step on the way to longer hair.
Just to throw another thing in here, didn't Roman soldiers have short hair long before Napolean came along? Hence the Ceasar cut for men?
Unless people specified the length of hair in inches in any document we have nothing historical to peg our standards to.
The point of fashion is that it changes and evolves and for many/most that's all hair is. Fashion.
Finally at knee, with a new quest for thick ends!
📸 Hairstagram
I consider past ear length to be longer-then-normal on a man. That is, it's not LONG, but it's worth noticing, and perhaps a step on the way to longer hair.
Yes it would be, but that is not what Paul was referring to. (He was referring to the way a certain group was living at the time....his point had nothing to do with the literal length of a man's hair).
To understand anything in the Bible, one must put it in the context of the local time period.
I'm mixing my Facebook and LHC! I was looking for the 'like' button! Equal opportunity hair typing!
~Lady Scheherazade, Keeper of the Sands in the Order of the Long Haired Knights~
For me it is anything past shoulder.
Checking in at Waist length 2012
Next Goal= Hip length (end of 2013)
I agree on equal opportunity - I'm a great advocate of equality in all ways - but I think that two things are relevant. First, the perception of society as a whole, which isn't egalitarian as regards hair; and second, from my observations, I am sure that if all cutting of hair were banned (lock up the stylists - there's an idea!), fewer men than women would achieve the "very long" lengths of classic or beyond.
I think half long hair on men is anything below the jaw line. And long hair is anything that can make a ponytail.
mininum of midback length for men, waist-length or longer for women
Bookmarks